,

潘尼卡的内在宗教对话理论:以张纯一为例证

The Intra-Religious Dialogue Theory of Raimon Panikkar: Using Zhang Chunyi as an Illustration

Yuen-tai SO

This paper introduces the intra-religious dialogue theory of Raimon Panikkar. Panikkar thinks that religious dialogue should be an intra-religious dialogue on all levels. An intra-religious dialogue is not a kind of dialectical dialogue, treating the other party as an it; instead, an intra-religious dialogue is a dialogical dialogue, treating the other party as a Thou. Panikkar argues that religious people should encounter each other not on the essential level but on the existential level. This means that the faith and belief of different religions should join together totally in the hearts of the participants. One of the important consequences of Panikkar's theory is that since the participants have to understand other religious persons on all possible dimensions, including reason, experience, feeling etc., there is a possibility that the participants may change their belief. As Panikkar said,”…to understand is to be converted to the truth one understands.”

The author finds that when Panikkar's theory is applied to the Chinese Buddhist-Christian dialogue scholar Zhang Chunyi, it appears to hold true. This paper also explores the religious biography of Zhang, showing that Zhang changed from a Christian to a Buddhist after more than ten years of intra-religious dialogues. This shows that Panikkar's theory is a useful interpretative framework for analyzing the thought of religious dialogue participants. Finally, the author emphasizes that although Panikkar's theory is valid for those holding a pluralistic position with regard to religion, it may not be equally valid for others, especially exclusivists. This means that Panikkar's theory has a qualified applicability.

评论被关闭,但引用和禁用Pingbacks是开放的。

相关文章

,

第四十七期编者的话

编者的话黄福光虽然我们没有这样计划,但今期的主题「身体神学」所收录的六篇专题文章,若细致划分,其实可以归为三个类别,每个类别两篇。首先,陈耀明和陈伟迦的文章可以归类为有关身体的圣经神学教导,以及其含义。第二类是李富豪和笔者的文章,谈论残疾。最后一类是赵崇明和潘怡蓉文章,谈论身体的美学与神学。 ...