,

巴特的批判实在论的辩证神学——敬覆赵崇明博士

The Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology of Karl Barth: Response to Dr. Chiu

OU Li-jen

In reading the review to which Dr. Chiu has devotes more than 6,000 words, I have no doubt that Dr. Chiu has shown a careful reading of my book. Although having occasional positive comments about my book, Dr. Chiu's overall evaluation of it is rather negative. Basically in the discussion below I will: (1) respond respectively to what Dr. Chiu has raised regarding my book's “problems” and “contradictions”; (2) argue against Dr. Chiu's sympathy with recent postmodern or non-foundationalist interpretation of Barth.

I will show in this response that the alleged “problems” and “contradictions” in my book actually come from the reviewer's misreading. I will also argue for my position that Barth is a methodologically or formally non-foundationalist but is by no means materially; therefore it is extremely inadequate to label Barth “a postmodern theologian”.

评论被关闭,但引用和禁用Pingbacks是开放的。

相关文章

,

第五十期编者的话

编者的话黄福光出版今期《山道期刊》的时候,香港正承受冲击:新冠肺炎疫症仍然流行,又有为数不少的人口移民他方。为回应这些现象,今期的专题定为「聚与散」。本期专题文章总共六篇,三篇属于圣经研究类,三篇属于实践神学类。 ...