,

「無障礙神學」與智障人士建立神人關係的模式政治

The Theology of Access and the Development of Divine-human Relationship for People with Intellectual Disability

LEE Fu Ho William

People with disability is not excluded from the gospel. The church and Christians should provide them access to approach God, as it is mandated by the gospel. The salvation of God is universal and granted to all people including those with intellectual disability. Therefore, a theological rationale needs to be developed for the sake of completing our discussion of soteriology to include people with intellectual disability. Reasoning, cognition, or usage of words and language are not necessary keys to build up a relationship with God and to our salvation; otherwise people with intellectual disability would be ignored and excluded in divine-human relationship. In other words, a solid and well-grounded theological rationale is needed to facilitate such a religion of inclusiveness; and we usually call it the theology of access. The theology of access will make the theological discussion of inclusiveness no longer speculative. Inclusiveness is always practical, and also has to be ecumenical. Therefore, the discussion of the theology of access cannot be separated from the “mainstream” discussion of theology, and it could in fact enrich the discipline of theology to manifest the Christian faith as universal and ecumenical as Christian theology should be.”God loves the world”; God’s love to the creature is unconditional. He unconditionally accepts all the mankind, including those with intellectual disability.

The aim of the theology of access is to include people with disability in soteriology or ecumenism. To achieve this, their responsiveness is important. It includes “the non-symbolic mode of responsiveness,” i.e. the responsiveness between people with or without disability, which is manifested in the friendship between them, and enriched by their mutual responses to each other. Therefore, the church should offer access to people with intellectual disability to make friendship in the church, so that their relationship with God could also be built up. However, this is not the only way to facilitate their divine-human relationship. People with intellectual disability could also use “symbolic mode of responsiveness” to respond to God, and thus receive access to build up a relationship with God. I argue that approaching Christian liturgy is a symbolic mode of response, and this includes following the practices of and participating in the rituals inherited from the Christian tradition. People with intellectual disability could discern the Spirit via participating in the Christian liturgy, and develop a positive divine-human relationship. Christian liturgy is not only for people with the capacity of reasoning, but also for people with less cognitive ability to discern the Spirit and to build up a proper relationship with God.

評論被關閉,但引用和禁用Pingbacks是開放的。

相關文章

,

第四十七期 編者的話

編者的話 黃福光 雖然我們沒有這樣計劃,但今期的主題「身體神學」所收錄的六篇專題文章,若細緻劃分,其實可以歸為三個類別,每個類別兩篇。首先,陳耀明和陳偉迦的文章可以歸類為有關身體的聖經神學教導,以及其含義。第二類是李富豪和筆者的文章,談論殘疾。最後一類是趙崇明和潘怡蓉文章,談論身體的美學與神學。...