,

巴特神學詮釋學之再思:評論歐力仁博士之《信仰的類比》

Karl Barth’s Theological Hermeneutics: Comment on Dr. Ou’s Analogia Fidei ─ Subversion and Revision of the Theology of Karl Barth

CHIU Shung-ming

This paper is a review of Dr. Ou’s Analogia Fidei ─ Subversion and Revision of the Theology of Karl Barth. It is essential for us to appreciate that the theological-hermeneutical question for Barth arises from his main theological concern, i.e. how to serve the church in its proclamation of the Word of God in a modern world. Undoubtedly, Dr. Ou has shown his sensitive awareness and clear interpretation of this area at various places in his book.

However, the reviewer also points out some questions for further discussion and exploration: (1) What was Barth’s view on the ontological relation between scripture and Jesus Christ as the revelation of God? (2) According to Barth, why does God use Scripture, influenced by human factor, as the mediate witness of his revelation? (3) How did Barth explain the hermeneutical circle between the revelation from above and the cultural influence from below? (4) Was Barth a methodologically non-foundationalist but materially tran-foundationalist as the author suggested? (5) In the light of Barth, the author argues that George Lindbeck cannot make the doctrine witness the absolute truth of God appropriately. Is this a reasonable comment?

評論被關閉,但引用和禁用Pingbacks是開放的。

相關文章

,

第四十七期 編者的話

編者的話 黃福光 雖然我們沒有這樣計劃,但今期的主題「身體神學」所收錄的六篇專題文章,若細緻劃分,其實可以歸為三個類別,每個類別兩篇。首先,陳耀明和陳偉迦的文章可以歸類為有關身體的聖經神學教導,以及其含義。第二類是李富豪和筆者的文章,談論殘疾。最後一類是趙崇明和潘怡蓉文章,談論身體的美學與神學。...