,

「曲」與「直」的是非──從神學及倫理學看同性戀

An Ethical and Theological Evaluation of Homosexuality

KWAN Kai Man

In recent decades, the gay movement has become quite influential in the West, and there are signs that it is going to have a larger and larger impact on the society of Hong Kong as well. The traditional Christian position regards homosexual acts as sinful. This is completely at odds with the trend of modern thought which regards homosexuality as morally acceptable. Many people even feel that an anti-homosexual stance is a kind of discrimination. In the first part of this paper, I examine many pro-homosexual arguments. They include appeals to moral relativism, love, tolerance, the experience of homosexuals, the freedom of self-expression, etc. I argue that none of these arguments succeeds in proving that homosexual acts are morally unproblematic. Moreover, these kinds of arguments will also tend to justify incest, paedophilia, and bestiality. I argue that ultimately those arguments are based on the values of secular humanism, and Christians should uphold values which are based on their theology instead. I further argue that a theological ethics is not rationally inferior to an ethics based on secular humanism. I defend the theological position on homosexuality but also point out that the traditional position also has some excesses which should be corrected. Lastly, I briefly discuss the issue of sexual orientation discrimination.

評論被關閉,但引用和禁用Pingbacks是開放的。

相關文章

,

第四十七期 編者的話

編者的話 黃福光 雖然我們沒有這樣計劃,但今期的主題「身體神學」所收錄的六篇專題文章,若細緻劃分,其實可以歸為三個類別,每個類別兩篇。首先,陳耀明和陳偉迦的文章可以歸類為有關身體的聖經神學教導,以及其含義。第二類是李富豪和筆者的文章,談論殘疾。最後一類是趙崇明和潘怡蓉文章,談論身體的美學與神學。...