,

帕爾默的接待倫理

Parker J. Palmer’s Ethics of Hospitality

CHIU Shung Ming

Given that Hong Kong is in a state of political uncertainty, with continuing discord in the post-Occupy era, the citizens inevitably live in a fragmented society filled with alienation and conflicts. The problem of fragmentation makes us disconnect with others, or even easily treat others as our enemies. The author attempts to call attention to the need of constructing a theological ethics of hospitality in a convincing way by introducing Parker J. Palmer’s thought, because he is regarded as one of the most promising theologians, who makes a notable contribution on this area.

Three concepts are very significant throughout Palmer’s books. They are wholeness, connection, and paradox, and thus we cannot understand his ethics of hospitality apart from them. Therefore, the author will explain the relationship between these concepts in the first part of this paper.

Fear of strangeness is natural in our common experience. Maybe we need to protect ourselves and, furthermore, having a sense of security is our basic need. However, if we refuse to meet strangers and only live in our private and lonely world, both our individual life and the society cannot grow in connection and wholeness. In Christian faith we understand that our identity is not to be found only in our differences from others, but in our common humanity, because all of us are made in the image of God and thus we are related as brothers and sisters in our God, the Father. We are created as social beings, so we need to learn to receive the others (including strangers and enemies) in our public life. According to Palmer, public life is the necessary condition of politics, especially for democracy. Moreover, the heart plays a significant role in public life and democratic politics. The heart of democracy is a heart imbued with love, with readiness to receive strangers and live together with them.

評論被關閉,但引用和禁用Pingbacks是開放的。

相關文章

,

第四十七期 編者的話

編者的話 黃福光 雖然我們沒有這樣計劃,但今期的主題「身體神學」所收錄的六篇專題文章,若細緻劃分,其實可以歸為三個類別,每個類別兩篇。首先,陳耀明和陳偉迦的文章可以歸類為有關身體的聖經神學教導,以及其含義。第二類是李富豪和筆者的文章,談論殘疾。最後一類是趙崇明和潘怡蓉文章,談論身體的美學與神學。...