,

潘寧博神學人觀的發展:一個跨科際方法的神學建構模式

The Development of Wolfhart Pannenberg’s Theological Anthropology: A Model of Theological Construction in Interdisciplinary Method

LEI Tin Kwan

This paper aims to study the development of Wolfhart Pannenberg’s theological anthropology by addressing and clarifying two questions one may face when trying to understand the development of his theological anthropology. (1) It is thought that there was a shift in Pannenberg’s theological anthropology in terms of methodology and content from Anthropology in Theological Perspective to the second volume of his Systematic Theology. (2) Scholars have often based their study of Pannenberg’s theological anthropology on his Anthropology in Theological Perspective or the earlier published What Is Man? Contemporary Anthropology in Theological Perspective. However, in view of (1), should we not approach Pannenberg’s theological anthropology—such as its starting point and foundation—differently? After an investigation of how he understands the work of theology and the development of his theological anthropology, this paper concludes that there was no shift in Pannenberg’s theological anthropology from Anthropology in Theological Perspective to the second volume of his Systematic Theology. In addition, in view of our understanding of Pannenberg’s theological anthropology, it is clearly more appropriate to use the relevant parts of the latter work as a starting point and basis for the study of his theological anthropology. Finally, this paper shows that Pannenberg has used a theologically grounded interdisciplinary method to construct his theological anthropology and even his entire theological system.

評論被關閉,但引用和禁用Pingbacks是開放的。

相關文章

,

第四十七期 編者的話

編者的話 黃福光 雖然我們沒有這樣計劃,但今期的主題「身體神學」所收錄的六篇專題文章,若細緻劃分,其實可以歸為三個類別,每個類別兩篇。首先,陳耀明和陳偉迦的文章可以歸類為有關身體的聖經神學教導,以及其含義。第二類是李富豪和筆者的文章,談論殘疾。最後一類是趙崇明和潘怡蓉文章,談論身體的美學與神學。...