保羅群體與「去堂會化」的想像

The Pauline Communities and the Imagination of “the De-Institutionalized Church”

LEUNG Chun Ho Bernard

　　This paper explores the contemporary phenomenon of “de-institutionalization of the church,” an emerging movement in response to the post-COVID 19 transformation of Christian communal life in Hong Kong. As online technologies have increasingly enabled believers to transcend the spatial and temporal constraints of traditional congregations, many begin to question the necessity of centralized, synchronous, and pastorally controlled church models. Instead, new forms of Christian practice—characterized by dispersion, autonomy, and decentralized participation—are gaining traction. The study distinguishes “de-institutionalization” from mere “dechurching,” arguing that the former is not a deliberate rejection of church institutions but a natural response to their declining adaptability and authority. Drawing parallels with such movements as the “emerging church” and “liquid church” among evangelicals in Western society, the paper highlights shared emphases on relational networks, participatory structures, and decentralized spiritual leadership.

　　To provide theoretical grounding, the discussion applies Max Weber’s concept of the “routinization of charisma” and the contemporary political-scientific framework of “decentralization” to analyze Pauline churches in the first century. Weber’s theory elucidates the transformation from charismatic to traditional or legal authority within early Christian communities, particularly showing how Paul’s personal charisma gradually gave way to institutional structures. In contrast, “de-institutionalized” groups today seek to reverse this process by reclaiming vitality, flexibility, personal relationship, and authenticity. The study further investigates the degree of decentralization in Paul’s congregations, with special attention to the Corinthian Lord’s Supper (1 Cor 11:17-34) and its socio-economic organization. By comparing Pauline communities to Graeco-Roman voluntary associations, the paper identifies egalitarian and participatory patterns (“flat hierarchy”) that reflect both political and fiscal decentralization. These features may stimulate the imagination toward models of shared leadership and financial sustainability within the “de-institutionalized” groups.

　　In sum, “de-institutionalization” is not a call for “anarchy” in the established church today but an invitation to reimagine Christian community beyond bureaucratic and hierarchical limits. Insights from the organizational structures of early Pauline communities and Graeco-Roman voluntary associations offer valuable analogies for revitalizing Christian life today.