,

Re-examination of the Historical Sources on the Episcopal Ordination of Athanasius

Re-examination of the Historical Sources on the Episcopal Ordination of Athanasius

Nathan K. N.G.

In the Arian and Melitian controversy, the legitimacy of the episcopal ordination of Athanasius is the key issue. If his ordination was illegal, all he did in the controversy would become inappropriate. However, the present historical sources about this ordination show such diverse pictures that Totally different conclusions can be made depending on which sources are to be trusted.

This article tries to re-evaluate each historical source and explore the true historical facts using modern historiographical methods. These historical sources include Athanasius' Apologia contra Arianos, Chronicon Athanasianum, Epiphanius' Panarion,Gregory Nazianzen's Orationes 21, Philostorgius' Historia Ecclesiastica, Socrates' Historia Ecclesiastica, Sozomen's Historia Ecclesiastica and Apophthegmata Patrum. Based on such re-evaluation, an historical re-construction of the episcopal ordination of Athanasius is provided at the end of the article.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.

Related Posts

,

第五十期 編者的話

Editor's Note When Wong Fuk-kwong published this issue of "Sandow Journal", Hong Kong was under impact: the COVID-19 epidemic was still prevalent, and a large number of people immigrated to other places. In response to these phenomena, the special topic of this issue is "Gathering and Dispersion". There are a total of six special articles in this issue, three of which are in the biblical studies category and three in the practical theology category. ...