,

再論「漢語學術神學」──回應賴品超等教授的批評

Rediscussion on Sino-Christian Academic Theology –– A Response to Criticism from Prof. Lai Pan-chiu and Others

Paulos HUANG

The present article is a response to criticisms of my book, Sino-Christian Academic Theology from Professor Lai Pan-chiu and others.  By defining theology as scientia, Christianity may be studied by internal (Christians) and external (non-Christians) persons, and through a personal (irrational reaction) or scholarly (rational analysis) approach.  Theology can be divided into theology I (Internal Irrational Christianity Practice), II (External Irrational Practice), III (Internal Rational Church Theology) and IV (External Rational Theology); and each of them has its strengths and weaknesses.  Since they have paid little attention to such a distinction, professors Lai Pan-chiu and Kwok Hung-biu have criticized my book from their own viewpoints only; in fact, I have been trying to construct a concept of Sino-Christian Academic Theology on the ground of these four levels of theology.  From the perspective of knowledge structure, Sino-Christian Academic Theology is worthy of developing into a sub-discipline of Sino-Christian Theology.

評論被關閉,但引用和禁用Pingbacks是開放的。

相關文章

,

第五十四期 編者的話

編者的話 吳國傑   主耶穌頒佈大使命,內容除了吩咐跟從者要在人群當中為主作見證,努力領人歸主外,還包括把主所吩咐的一切,都教導信徒遵守。也就是說,要裝備信徒,使他們成為能夠明白聖經、實踐真道的門徒。近年香港出現移民潮,許多教友相繼移居他方,其中有部分甚至是堂會曾經銳意培育的下一代領袖接班人,香港靈命成熟的信徒數目驟減,堂會內能夠承擔重要事奉崗位的領導團隊,漸漸出現青黃不接的現象。培訓更多信眾起來承擔使命,成為不少堂會解決當前困境的應急策略。今期《山道期刊》以「信徒裝備」為主題,期盼藉著眾學者對聖經、歷史和實踐神學的研究,給華人教會帶來啟迪。...