,

當受害者成為加害者:舊約與報復──從以斯帖記看起

Old Testament and Revenge: Viewed from the Book of Esther

Timothy S. J. WU

The LXX and Jewish tradition added the name of God and attributed “hidden” spirituality to Esther and Mordecai in the book of Esther so that the book, where the name YHWH is absent, can be included in the Old Testament canon. However, from the perspective of textual criticism, the MT version of the book of Esther is the original version and any “addition” is superfluous. These types of cover-ups not only do not offer satisfactory explanations for the carnage committed by the Jews, they expose the weaknesses of the characters in the drama — Esther and Mordecai used ethically questionable means to consolidate their positions in a Gentile society. The reason the book of Esther could be part of the canon is not that it shows “humans are loveable” but that “God is love.” From the perspective of the Old Testament Historical books, taken as a whole, and biblical theology, the transformation of the “victims” into “avengers” recorded in the ninth chapter of the book does not constitute a holy war, much less a model of Old Testament ethics. The Biblical view on revenge is consistent; it is not “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,” but “it is mine to avenge; I will repay.” The contribution of this book to Old Testament ethics is that the more humans act, the more God is hidden!

評論被關閉,但引用和禁用Pingbacks是開放的。

相關文章

,

第五十三期 編者的話

編者的話 黃福光   本期《山道期刊》的專題是「神學研究的跨學科整合」。如何用六篇文章的篇幅好好論述這個大題目,實在是一項挑戰。儘管如此,今期收錄的文章涵蓋了多個方面,可以讓讀者稍稍了解這個領域。...