,

The Bible, History, and Archaeology: Is There a Future for the Past?

The Bible, History, and Archeology: Is There a Future for the Past?

Roger CALLAWAY

The nature and viability of “Biblical” archaeology is in question today. The original vision of WF Albright, which linked archaeology, history, and the Bible together has slowly eroded away under the modern pressures of fragmentation and critical research. The practical result is that a large gulf exists between archaeologists working in Israel and those in the strictly religious/church world who wish to use the results of archaeology to bolster the claims of their faith. While there can be no doubt that the older vision of integration was inadequate, and even misleading at times, the need for integration is greater than ever for the sake of both academic research in Biblical Studies and Christian religious life. However, this will require that all concerned gain a new understanding of the nature of biblical texts, historiography, and archaeological research.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.

Related Posts

,

Issue Editors’ Page for Issue 57

Editor's Note by Lei Jiansheng and Deng Shaoguang: Preaching is the oldest mission of the church, yet it is also the most easily misunderstood. Under the impact of consumerist culture, preaching is increasingly understood as a communication technique, and the effectiveness of the pulpit is often measured by audience satisfaction. This issue of *Mountain Way Journal*, themed "Preaching the Word," invites six scholars to re-examine the theological foundations, interpretive principles, rhetorical resources, and practical directions of preaching in the contemporary context from different perspectives. ...